You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 2, February 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Corneal Disorders
 •Ophthalmological Procedures, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Epithelial Downgrowth Following Descemet’s-Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

B. Michael Walker, MD; Holly B. Hindman, MD; Katayoon B. Ebrahimi, MD; W. Richard Green, MD; Charles G. Eberhart, MD, PhD; Ivan Garcia, MD; Albert S. Jun, MD, PhD

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Corneal endothelial cell dysfunction is a common indication for penetrating keratoplasty.1 Significant postoperative complications such as high astigmatism, suture breakage or infection, and graft dehiscence have led to the development of alternative surgical approaches for endothelial replacement. In 1999, Melles et al2 reported a successful case of posterior lamellar keratoplasty in a human patient. This procedure was subsequently modified and renamed deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty in 2001 by Terry and Ousley.3 Compared with penetrating keratoplasty, advantages of deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty include reduced postoperative astigmatism with quicker visual recovery and a lower frequency of wound dehiscence and suture complications.4-5 However, this procedure was slow to gain widespread acceptance owing in part to its technically demanding nature. Melles et al6 subsequently developed . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Report of a Case

Clinical History

Examination

In Vivo Confocal Microscopy

Histopathologic Examination


Comment

AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Posterior Lamellar Endothelial Keratoplasty: Corneal Transplantation and Refractive Surgery Intersect
Roger F. Steinert
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(2):263-264.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Introduction of Epithelial Cells in the Flap-Graft Interface During Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty
Saelens et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:936-937.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.