You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 126 No. 12, December 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Disorders, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Preference-Based Measures of Health States

How Can We Use the Vision Preference Value Scale?

Steven M. Kymes, PhD, MHA

Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1765-1766.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this issue of Archives, the Submacular Surgery Trials Group presents an evaluation of the Vision Preference Value Scale (VPVS).1 In contrast to more commonly known measures of quality of life, such as the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, which measures a person's perception of their visual function, the VPVS (and similar survey instruments, such as the Impact of Visual Impairment questionnaire2) measures a person's preference for function. That is, rather than asking if the person has difficulty reading, the investigator measures the person's preference for being able to read (ie, how much being able to read matters to the person). As with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, the investigator may use responses to the VPVS to create summary scales that measure the overall outcome of an intervention and thus the person's preference for the change in health status following treatment. . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Surgical Removal vs Observation for Idiopathic or Ocular Histoplasmosis Syndrome–Associated Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization: Vision Preference Value Scale Findings From the Randomized SST Group H Trial: SST Report No. 17
Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(12):1626-1632.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Use of Global Visual Acuity Data in a Time Trade-off Approach to Calculate the Cost Utility of Cataract Surgery: Methodological Issues of Cost-Utility Comparisons
Frick and Massof
Arch Ophthalmol 2009;127:1205-1206.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.