You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 9, September 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinical Trial Retrospective
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Medical Ethics
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Evaluating the Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (CRYO-ROP)

Monte D. Mills, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(9):1276-1281.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study (CRYO-ROP) remains one of the largest investigations ever organized for a pediatric ophthalmic disease. Spanning more than 20 years so far, and involving hundreds of ophthalmologists, neonatologists, photographers, visual acuity testers, and other investigators in 23 clinical centers across the United States, this gargantuan effort has produced high-quality data about the benefits of treatment of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with peripheral retinal ablation as well as the natural history of ROP and the development and measurement of visual function in young children with developmental and visual impairment. In addition, this trial led to innovations in the design and organization of randomized interventional trials that have gained wide acceptance and application in other fields.

What is the best measure of the success of a clinical trial? Formally, trials must be judged first on the ability to achieve . . . [Full Text of this Article]

STUDY GOALS


STUDY DESIGN
Patient Selection and Randomization

Treatment Methods

Outcome Measures

Ethical Considerations

Statistical Measures


STUDY RESULTS
Primary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

Natural History Control Outcomes


STUDY CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

INFLUENCE OF THE STUDY ON SUBSEQUENT CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS

INFLUENCE OF THE STUDY ON CLINICAL PRACTICE IN MANAGEMENT OF ROP

AUTHOR INFORMATION






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.