You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 8, August 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(8):1106.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 114 words of the full text and any section headings.

Until within recent years, the ophthalmologist in this country either was largely self taught so far as his specialty was concerned or obtained his first special training abroad, notable in Vienna, Berlin or London. For years Vienna was the Mecca for American would-be ophthalmologists. Those who studied there could be divided into three classes; those who had failed to obtain an internship in America, those who sought the prestige connected with foreign study and, those who were chiefly motivated by the desire to obtain the best possible training. Those in the third class were fewest, but generally remained abroad the longest.

Reference: Verhoeff FH. American ophthalmology during the past century. Arch Ophthalmol. 1948;39(4):460.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.