You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 6, June 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past. . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(6):764.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 107 words of the full text and any section headings.

Still we hold conflicting views, perhaps because they are many of them founded, not on rigid investigation and experiment, but, as is often unavoidable, on more or less hasty impressions and on prejudice. I may as well say, to begin with, that my prejudice was in favor of boiling alkaline solutions for sterilizing instruments, and that my experiments were undertaken to see if the objection brought forward against this method were well founded. My preference for this was founded, of course, on the overwhelming weight of evidence accumulated by general surgeons from Schimmelbusch down.

Reference: Lancaster WB. The sterilization and care of instruments. Arch Ophthalmol. 1901;30:394.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.