You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 12, December 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(12):1629.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The extraction of teeth rarely causes purulent inflammation of the orbital cellular tissues. Feuer, in his paper published in 1892, reviews ten cases. Hirsch, in 1894, was able to collect twenty-five cases. He remarked, however, that in most cases there had been caries of the teeth, and frequently the extraction had led to improvement in the orbital condition, or even to complete recovery from it. Hirsch considers as pure cases only those of Tetzer, Vossius, Burnett, and Fage, adding three observations of his own, in which the extraction of a carious tooth was followed by septic infection and the speedy development of a retrobulbar phlegmon. Our case is of the same sort. . . . In our case the infective matter passed from the alveolar process into the antrum, and thence through the venous anastomoses into the orbit. In the process the purulent masses rarefied the wall of the nose, and on the sixth . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.