 |
 |

A look at the past . . .
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1522.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 109 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Römer reports three cases of intraocular infection in which iodoform was introduced into the anterior chamber. In the first case, one of staphylococcus infection after a myopia operation, there was complete recovery and V = 6/9 was obtained. In the second case, a perforating injury from a bit of stone, with traumatic cataract and beginning panophthalmitis, the iodoform was efficacious and the panophthalmitis passed off. . . . In the third case there was infection with a peculiar bacillus after a cataract extraction, and the clinical course did not resemble that of purulent infection. Iodoform was of no service.
Reference: Römer W. Notes on the action of iodoform in intraocular infections. Arch Ophthalmol. 1902;31:44.
|