You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 11, November 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(11):1522.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 109 words of the full text and any section headings.

Römer reports three cases of intraocular infection in which iodoform was introduced into the anterior chamber. In the first case, one of staphylococcus infection after a myopia operation, there was complete recovery and V = 6/9 was obtained. In the second case, a perforating injury from a bit of stone, with traumatic cataract and beginning panophthalmitis, the iodoform was efficacious and the panophthalmitis passed off. . . . In the third case there was infection with a peculiar bacillus after a cataract extraction, and the clinical course did not resemble that of purulent infection. Iodoform was of no service.

Reference: Römer W. Notes on the action of iodoform in intraocular infections. Arch Ophthalmol. 1902;31:44.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.