You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 125 No. 10, October 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125(10):1418.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 116 words of the full text and any section headings.

Mr. Marcus Gunn opened the discussion on functional (hysterical) derangements of the eye. He described the various conditions met with. In regard to diagnosis, the chief difficulty was to distinguish between this condition and malingering. He thought that in cases where neutralized glasses brought the vision up, the blindness was really assumed. Complete double amaurosis is exceedingly rare. He himself only knew of 1 case, and in this the blindness was really feigned, and it was entirely cured by suggestion.

With regard to pupil reflexes, he put great stress on their direct and indirect action.

Reference: Devereux Marshall C. British Medical Association, report on its meeting at Manchester, July and August, 1902. Arch Ophthalmol. 1902;31:587.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2007 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.