You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 4, April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Alert me on articles by topic

We Can Aim at Better Results in Coming Years—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

The design for the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity revolved around our desire to test whether cryotherapy would prevent blindness. With that concept in mind, we used a binary functional outcome of favorable vs unfavorable visual acuity. Visual acuity of 20/200 or worse is customarily classified as legal blindness. This was our unfavorable visual acuity outcome definition, which produced the semantic oddity of the term favorable to describe the opposite category, even though this would include eyes that were somewhat visually impaired. Thus, Jalali and Hussain correctly note that visual acuity in the range of 20/60 to 20/200 is not necessarily favorable in the usual sense of the word.

Macular dragging, an intermediate outcome between structurally favorable and unfavorable, was categorized as favorable since macular morphology is relatively preserved. Dragged macula can produce pseudostrabismus by altering the angle {kappa}, or it may induce anisometropia that . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Earl A. Palmer, MD


RELATED LETTER

We Can Aim at Better Results in Coming Years
Subhadra Jalali and Anjli Hussain
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):604-605.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLES

15-Year Outcomes Following Threshold Retinopathy of Prematurity: Final Results From the Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity
Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(3):311-318.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Premature for Life
Alistair R. Fielder
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(3):392-394.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Multicenter Trial of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity: Ophthalmological Outcomes at 10 Years
Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity Cooperative Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(8):1110-1118.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.