You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 124 No. 4, April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Controversies
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Choroidal Neovascularization
 •Macular Degeneration
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Perspectives on Verteporfin Therapy Combined With Intravitreal Corticosteroids

Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124:561-563.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Since its approval in 1999, photodynamic therapy (PDT) using verteporfin has become the most important strategy in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Verteporfin therapy has a proven benefit seen in many subtypes of choroidal neovascularization (CNV). In predominantly classic lesions, 59% of verteporfin-treated patients lost fewer than 3 lines as compared with 31% of sham-treated eyes.1 In patients with occult CNV with smaller lesions or lower levels of visual acuity, stable vision is seen in 51% of eyes in the verteporfin group while only 25% of sham-treated eyes maintained stable vision.2 Subgroup analysis suggests that verteporfin may also reduce the risk of vision loss in lesions with minimally classic features smaller than 4 Macular Photocoagulation Study disc areas. Most importantly, vision stabilization and absence of leakage activity was maintained during an extended follow-up of as long as 5 years with no relevant need for retreatment beyond 18 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth, MD; Stephan Michels, MD; Albert Augustin, MD
Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (Drs Schmidt-Erfurth and Michels); and Department of Ophthalmology, Städt Klinikum, Karlsruhe, Germany (Dr Augustin).


RELATED ARTICLE

Should Corticosteroids Be Considered as Part of the Standard Care With Photodynamic Therapy?
Marco Zarbin
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):563-571.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.