 |
 |

Standard Image of Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In our recent article, "The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity Revisited,"1 Figure 10 was not the standard image used to diagnose plus disease that we indicated in the text. Rather, it is the example of plus disease used in the original classification published in 1984.2 The Figure of plus disease we provide here is the standard image used to diagnose plus disease in several large treatment trials4-7 of retinopathy of prematurity in the United States, including the recent Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity study.6 We think it is important to provide this standard image for readers of the ARCHIVES because the minimum standard for plus disease is more important than ever in determining which infants should be treated for retinopathy of prematurity.
Figure appears in full text version.
|
|
|
|
Figure. Fundus photograph showing minimum standard of vascular tortuosity and dilation for diagnosis of plus disease. Reprinted with permission from Archives of Ophthalmology.3 Copyright . . . [Full Text of this Article]
|
|
|
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Antonio Capone, Jr, MD;
Anna L. Ells, MD, FRCS(C),, Cochair;
Alistair R. Fielder, FRCOphth;
John T. Flynn, MD;
Glen A. Gole, MD, FRANZCO;
William V. Good, MD;
Jonathan M. Holmes, BM, BCh;
Gerd Holmstrom, MD, PhD;
Ximena Katz, MD;
J. Arch McNamara, MD;
Earl A. Palmer, MD;
Graham E. Quinn, MD, MSCE,, Cochair;
Michael Shapiro, MD;
Michael G. J. Trese, MD;
David K. Wallace, MD
RELATED ARTICLE
The International Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity Revisited
An International Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(7):991-999.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Accuracy of ROPtool vs Individual Examiners in Assessing Retinal Vascular Tortuosity
Wallace et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1523-1530.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|