You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Controversies
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (45)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Cataracts/ Lens
 •Intraocular Lenses
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intraocular Lenses Should Block UV Radiation and Violet but Not Blue Light

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:550-555.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Blue light–blocking intraocular lenses (IOLs) trade off rod-mediated visual function for limited protection against acute retinal phototoxicity.1 Twenty-five years ago, I cautioned ophthalmologists and manufacturers that clear IOLs transmitted potentially harmful 330- to 400-nm UV radiation (UVR) to the retina.2-3 Within a few years, most manufacturers incorporated UVR-blocking chromophores into IOLs.4 Eighteen years ago, I suggested blocking violet light in addition to UVR.4 Violet light has substantial potential retinal phototoxicity but little effect on scotopic (nighttime) or photopic (daytime) vision.5-7 Nonetheless, visible light–blocking IOLs have been introduced only recently in the United States.

The term blue is often used for the broad range of optical radiation between 400 and 500 nm. There are significant differences in retinal phototoxicity and scotopic luminous efficiency between shorter- and longer-wavelength "blue" light, so it is valuable to use the terms violet for shorter-wavelength, 400- to 440-nm light and blue for longer-wavelength, 440- to 500-nm . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RETINAL PHOTOTOXICITY


RETINAL AGING AND LIGHT EXPOSURE

AGING AND SCOTOPIC VISION

BLOCK VIOLET, NOT BLUE LIGHT

CONCLUSION

SUMMARY

AUTHOR INFORMATION
Martin A. Mainster, PhD, MD, FRCOphth
Author Affiliations: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

A Blue-Blocking Intraocular Lens Should Be Used in Cataract Surgery
Richard E. Braunstein and Janet R. Sparrow
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(4):547-549.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Spectral transmission of intraocular lenses expressed as a virtual age
van Norren and van de Kraats
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:1374-1375.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Use of Purkinje Images to Identify Colored Intraocular Lens Filters
Walker et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:851-851.
FULL TEXT  

Visual function in patients with yellow tinted intraocular lenses compared with vision in patients with non-tinted intraocular lenses
Hayashi and Hayashi
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1019-1023.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Violet and blue light blocking intraocular lenses: photoprotection versus photoreception
Mainster
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:784-792.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.