You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Dilemma of Exercising Clinical Judgment in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity—Reply

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In reply

We thank the authors for their interest and comments. One theme that emerges from these letters is concern about treatment of eyes where spontaneous involution of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) might otherwise occur. Computations provided by Dr Averbukh offer a "saved to treated ratio" in an effort to evaluate the amount of unnecessary treatment in the Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity (ETROP) study. Dr Vander and colleagues calculate a number needed to treat (NNT) and suggest that, at least for zone II high-risk prethreshold eyes, further analysis should be performed before recommending this as a standard-of-care intervention. Dr Jalali and colleagues offer a different method for calculating an NNT. All these computations are problematic for a number of reasons.

The overall benefit of earlier treatment of high-risk prethreshold eyes is 2-fold. First, there is benefit to eyes that will ultimately progress to threshold. Approximately 66% of high-risk . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
William V. Good, MD; Robert J. Hardy, PhD


RELATED ARTICLE

The Dilemma of Exercising Clinical Judgment in the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity
David Coats and Richard Saunders
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(3):408-409.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The further refinement of ROP treatment. Commentary on the Early Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity study: structural findings at 2 years of age
Fielder and Wilkinson
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007;91:136-137.
FULL TEXT  

The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Clinical Trial: presentation by subgroups versus analysis within subgroups.
Hardy et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1341-1342.
FULL TEXT  

The Early Treatment for Retinopathy Of Prematurity Study: structural findings at age 2 years
The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2006;90:1378-1382.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.