You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 3, March 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatric Ophthalmology
 •Retinal/ Chorioretinal Disorders
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Clinical Application of the Revised Indications for the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The article titled "Revised Indications for the Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity"1 provided results of treatment on eyes with prethreshold retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) that were at highest risks for the development of threshold ROP. Based on the study data, the authors recommend a clinical algorithm to treat cases with ROP. Is it possible to look at the data slightly differently?

1. Functional outcome: The treatment reduced unfavorable visual outcomes from 19.5% to 14.5%. While this is statistically significant, if we calculate a confidence interval for this difference, the interval crosses zero and extends from –0.75% to 10.75%. Odds ratios from discordant pairs substantiate this and show an odds ratio of 2.88. The number needed to treat (NNT) for this intervention2 is 20 (Table 41). NNT indicates how many patients similar to the study patients must be treated (as the average study group patient was treated) to obtain 1 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Subhadra Jalali, MS; Vera A. Essuman, MD; Ravi Thomas, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The further refinement of ROP treatment. Commentary on the Early Treatment of Retinopathy of Prematurity study: structural findings at 2 years of age
Fielder and Wilkinson
Br J Ophthalmol 2007;91:136-137.
FULL TEXT  

The Early Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Clinical Trial: presentation by subgroups versus analysis within subgroups.
Hardy et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1341-1342.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.