You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 123 No. 12, December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Radiologic Imaging
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Elegant Diagnosis

Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:1739-1740.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

I hear people say that the fun is gone from medicine. Certainly, the bureaucracy is increasingly burdensome. However, the practice of medicine still has a lot of opportunities for fun. One of the great pleasures of medicine is solving the intellectual puzzle of the challenging diagnosis.

Diagnostic technology has come a long way, and it is possible to make a diagnosis using brute force. However, we all remember our admiration for the great professors in medical school who were able to come up with a critical diagnosis by noticing some subtle physical finding or asking just the right question of the patient (the one that you forgot in your 1-hour detailed history). Those kinds of superstar diagnoses are embellished by memory and retelling and clearly are not a realistic goal for everyday practice. I do think that a realistic goal is to be able to make what I call an . . . [Full Text of this Article]


AUTHOR INFORMATION
Robert Alan Goldberg, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Technetium Tc 99m–Labeled Red Blood Cells in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Cavernous Hemangioma and Other Vascular Orbital Tumors
Ennio Polito, Luca Burroni, Patrizia Pichierri, Antonio Loffredo, and Angelo G. Vattimo
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123(12):1678-1683.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Noninvasive Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Time-Resolved Imaging of Contrast KineticS (TRICKS) in the Evaluation of Orbital Vascular Lesions
Kahana et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1635-1642.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.