You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 7, July 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Special Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship
 •Medical Ethics
 •Ophthalmology, Other
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fish Stories and Clinical Trials

William C. Frayer, MD; William J. Frayer, AB, MSEd

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1049-1051.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In this era of ever-increasing printed and electronic publications, we often take for granted the accuracy of the information provided. As the meaning of the presentation is debated, we assume that the data on which we base our judgment have been honestly and accurately developed. Occasionally, it is wise to remember that editorial lapses may lead to false conclusions, as the following story will illustrate.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science, along with its weekly publication, Science, had served for more than a century as a dependable public source of scientific information. It was no surprise, therefore, that when an article appeared in the September 12, 1952, issue of the magazine claiming success in the prevention and treatment of cataracts by the administration of fish lens protein, the proposal received widespread attention. Soon, an estimated 1000 volunteers had . . . [Full Text of this Article]

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia (Dr Frayer); and the Department of Humanities, Central Maine Community College, Auburn (Mr Frayer). The authors have no relevant financial interest in this article.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Reporting the Results of Randomized Clinical Trials: A Priority of Archives of Ophthalmology
Roy W. Beck
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(7):1038-1039.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A 5-Year, Multicenter, Open-Label, Safety Study of Adjunctive Latanoprost Therapy for Glaucoma
Albert Alm, John Schoenfelder, and Jacquie McDermott
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122(7):957-965.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.