You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 3, March 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Corneal Disorders
 •Laser Surgery
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Relapsing Diffuse Lamellar Keratitis After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Associated With Recurrent Erosion Syndrome

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:396-398.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Diffuse lamellar keratitis (DLK) is a well-described complication of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) that generally occurs within the first week after surgery. Late-onset cases of DLK have been reported to occur many months after surgery and are sometimes associated with recurrent erosions.1-3 We describe 3 patients who had intraoperative epithelial defects and who subsequently developed DLK multiple times in the same location of the same eye, always following an episode of recurrent erosion.

Report of Cases

Case 1

A 33-year-old woman underwent bilateral LASIK in May 2001 for high myopia. Preoperative evaluation revealed clear corneas with no evidence of anterior basement membrane dystrophy. The procedure was uneventful in the right eye. In the left eye, however, a 2.0 x 2.0-mm corneal epithelial defect was noted in the superior paracentral location after creation of the flap, and the epithelium surrounding the defect was noted to be generally poorly adherent to the Bowman layer. A bandage . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Case 2

Case 3


Comment
Bennie H. Jeng, MD; Jay M. Stewart, MD; Stephen D. McLeod, MD; David G. Hwang, MD
San Francisco, Calif

Corresponding author: David G. Hwang, MD, Cornea and Refractive Surgery Service, Department of Ophthalmology, 10 Kirkham St, Room K-301, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143-0730 (e-mail: dghwang@itsa.ucsf.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.