
Histopathology of Documented Growth in Small Melanocytic Choroidal Tumors
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:1876-1878.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Differentiation of a choroidal nevus from a small choroidal melanoma can be difficult. Choroidal nevi are generally asymptomatic lesions1 that are less than 6 mm in diameter and less than 1.5 mm in height. The presence of drusen or areas of atrophy of the overlying retinal pigment epithelium generally indicate a chronic, inactive choroidal nevus.1 Orange pigment and subretinal fluid are more commonly present in choroidal melanomas.2 Echography usually demonstrates medium to high internal reflectivity in nevi and low reflectivity in melanomas. Documented growth3-4 is widely interpreted as evidence of malignancy.
We provide the histopathology of 2 small choroidal melanocytic tumors that became symptomatic, developed orange pigment, and showed documented growth. One lesion was an epithelioid malignant melanoma; the other was a benign nevus.
Report of Cases
Case 1
A 45-year-old man was examined in May 1996 at the Ocular Oncology Clinic of the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor, for an enlarging, . . . [Full Text of this Article] Case 2 Histopathological Findings
Comment
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Victor M. Elner, MD, PhD;
Andrew Flint, MD;
Andrew K. Vine, MD
RELATED LETTER
Observed Growth in Small Melanocytic Choroidal Tumors
Tero Kivelä
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006;124(4):607-608.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Size Overlap between Benign Melanocytic Choroidal Nevi and Choroidal Malignant Melanomas
Augsburger et al.
IOVS 2008;49:2823-2828.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Observed growth in small melanocytic choroidal tumors.
Kivela
Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:607-608.
FULL TEXT
Growing Melanocytic Tumor Is Not Always Cancer
Abramson
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:1457-1458.
FULL TEXT
PET/CT imaging: detection of choroidal melanoma
Reddy et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005;89:1265-1269.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|