 |
 |

Discussion on Retro-ocular Neuritis
Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:10.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 72 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
The President then called upon Mr R. Marcus Gunn (London) to open the discussion on Retro-ocular Neuritis. Mr Gunn said that he should include in this category all cases which showed evidence of the optic nerve being impaired by an inflammatory affection behind the papilla . . . Other characters were impaired pupil reaction to light, an absence of early ophthalmoscopic changes, and a tendency to recovery.
Source: The Lancet. 1904:2;12
|