You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 122 No. 1, January 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  From the Archives of the Archives
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Discussion on Retro-ocular Neuritis

Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:10.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 72 words of the full text and any section headings.

The President then called upon Mr R. Marcus Gunn (London) to open the discussion on Retro-ocular Neuritis. Mr Gunn said that he should include in this category all cases which showed evidence of the optic nerve being impaired by an inflammatory affection behind the papilla . . . Other characters were impaired pupil reaction to light, an absence of early ophthalmoscopic changes, and a tendency to recovery.

Source: The Lancet. 1904:2;12



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.