You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 8, August 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Ophthalmological Disorders, Other
 •Diagnosis
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Utility of 0.5% Apraclonidine in the Diagnosis of Horner Syndrome

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1201-1203.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In 1999, Morales et al1 reported that 1.0% apraclonidine hydrochloride (Iopidine; Alcon, Ft Worth, Tex) could be used to diagnose Horner syndrome. Apraclonidine caused reversal of anisocoria (the miotic pupil with Horner syndrome became larger than the normal pupil) in all patients in their study. Apraclonidine is primarily an {alpha}2-receptor agonist, but it does have some weak {alpha}1 affinity, as evidenced by conjunctival blanching. The authors postulated that the reversal of anisocoria was due to denervation hypersensitivity of {alpha}1-receptors in the pupil dilator muscle. The purpose of our study is to determine whether 0.5% apraclonidine, which is less expensive and more readily available than the 1.0% formulation, might also be used to diagnose Horner syndrome in the same lighting conditions.

Report of Cases

Patients with known or newly diagnosed Horner syndrome in 2 of our practices (those of R.A. and K.A.F.) were invited to participate, and institutional review board approval was obtained. Cases were . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Comment
Sandra M. Brown, MD
Lubbock, Tex

Rachid Aouchiche, MD
Ft Myers, Fla

Kenn A. Freedman, MD
Lubbock

Corresponding author: Sandra M. Brown, MD, 3601 Fourth St, Stop 7217, Lubbock, TX 79430 (e-mail: sandra.brown@ttuhsc.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

The sensitivity and specificity of 0.5% apraclonidine in the diagnosis of oculosympathetic paresis
Koc et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1442-1444.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Utility of 0.5% Apraclonidine in the Diagnosis of Horner Syndrome
Brown
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:578-578.
FULL TEXT  

The Utility of 0.5% Apraclonidine in the Diagnosis of Horner Syndrome--Reply
Bacal
Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:578-578.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.