You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 7, July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Ophthalmology, Other
 •Complementary and Alternative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

International Guidelines

All for One and One for All?

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1043-1044.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THE INTERNATIONAL Council of Ophthalmology and the World Health Organization are in the process of approving the development of international guidelines for eye care based on the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Patterns (PPPs) and its condensed form of Summary Benchmarks.1 Although the objective of PPPs may remain unclear to some, the American Medical Association states that the primary goal of such practice parameters is physician-centered, that is, "to assist physicians in clinical decision-making."2 A secondary, unstated but recognized, profession-centered goal also exists, which is to raise and abolish differentials in the overall level of ophthalmic practice within the United States.

Preferred practice patterns and similar guidelines in other medical specialties have rapidly gained widespread acceptance in certain sectors of the American medical care community, so much so that "rates of compliance with" and "ways of enforcing" such guidelines are being debated.3-4 Now, there is an effort to replicate . . . [Full Text of this Article]

MINIMUM STANDARDS VS DETAILED RECOMMENDATIONS


TRADITION MIGHT GET IN THE WAY

GUIDELINES SPECIFIC FOR TIME AND PLACE

INTERNATIONAL (BUT NOT GLOBAL) GUIDELINES


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

International Guidelines: All for One and One for All?--Reply
Okada
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1091-1092.
FULL TEXT  

International Guidelines: All for One and One for All?
Tso et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1090-1091.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.