You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 121 No. 12, December 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Photo Essay
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Laser Surgery
 •Ocular Imaging
 •Refractive Surgery
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment of Macrostriae and Epithelial Ingrowth Following Laser In Situ Keratomileusis With Interrupted Sutures

Patricia S. Tsai, MD; Stephen D. McLeod, MD
San Francisco Calif

Arch Ophthalmol. 2003;121:1800-1801.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

A 42-YEAR-OLD woman who had undergone bilateral simultaneous laser in situ keratomileusis 2 weeks earlier at another institution was referred to our service for management of bilateral macrostriae and epithelial ingrowth after failed repositioning of dislocated flaps, which had been noted on the first day following surgery (Figure 1 and Figure 2). At our examination, uncorrected visual acuity was 20/60 OD and 20/200 OS, and best-corrected visual acuity was 20/50 OD and 20/80 OS. One month later, the flap was elevated completely, epithelial ingrowth was removed by scraping, and 14 and 7 radial interrupted flap sutures were placed in the right and left corneas, respectively, to secure the flap edge and treat the macrostriae (Figure 3). Sutures were removed after 2 weeks, resulting in an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/25 OU and a best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

COMMENT



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2003 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.