You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Clinicopathologic Reports, Case Reports, and Small Case Series
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Prophylaxis of Vasovagal Reaction With Atrohist Plus

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1079-1080.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) can present a treatment dilemma for medical professionals, and fear of causing such reactions can prevent ophthalmologists from performing necessary examinations. Atenolol, midodrine hydrochloride, paroxetine, fludrocortisone acetate, as well as salt and fluid intake have demonstrated efficacy in treating the disorder.1 Other vasoconstrictors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are being studied, but to our knowledge, there are no medications to prevent isolated incidents of VVR with known triggers.2 We describe 2 patients who experienced VVRs on applanation tonometry or instillation of dilating drops. Subsequent reactions were prevented with oral Atrohist Plus (a combination of phenylephrine hydrochloride, phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride, chlorpheniramine maleate, hyoscyamine sulfate, atropine sulfate, and scopolamine hydrobromide; Vintage Pharmaceuticals Inc, Charlotte, NC) administered 1 hour prior to examination.

Report of Cases

Case 1

A 41-year-old healthy man with an ocular history of myopia and a family history of glaucoma was seen for complaints of decreased visual acuity for several months. After instillation . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Case 2


Comment
Corresponding author: Norbert Becker, MD, Cook County Hospital, 1835 W Harrison, Chicago, IL 60612(e-mail: www.genevaeye.com).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.