You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 7, July 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Early Detection of Moderate Glaucoma

Redefining Clinical Care in 2001

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1069-1070.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

SINCE 1996, the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP) for primary open-angle glaucoma1 has defined glaucoma as an acquired optic neuropathy with either visual field or optic nerve manifestations. Buttressed by mounting evidence that optic nerve damage generally precedes detectable visual field damage,1-3 the PPP defines early glaucoma as having no visual field defect on routine threshold perimetry. The presence of any characteristic visual field loss defines the severity as at least moderate in nature. This, in turn, generates important clinical questions.

First, what role do the various imaging technologies have in relation to stereophotographs and clinical examinations in detecting those who already have moderate glaucoma (associated with visual field loss) in 2001? In this edition of the ARCHIVES, Zangwill et al4 report a comparison of several methods of evaluation of the optic nerve for their ability to differentiate between patients with proven (reliable and reproducible) mild or . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Discriminating Between Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes Using the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph, GDx Nerve Fiber Analyzer, and Optical Coherence Tomograph
Linda M. Zangwill, Christopher Bowd, Charles C. Berry, Julia Williams, Eytan Z. Blumenthal, César A. Sánchez-Galeana, Christiana Vasile, and Robert N. Weinreb
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):985-993.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.