

Fifteen Years of Work
The COMS Outcomes for Medium-Sized Choroidal Melanoma
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1067-1068.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
CHOROIDAL MELANOMA is the most common primary ocular malignancy, with
some 1500 new cases reported yearly in the United States. These tumors are
both sight- and life-threatening, with approximately a 10% to 30% five-year
mortality rate owing to systemic metastasis, depending on tumor size. Despite
the major morbidity and mortality from these tumors, the condition occurs
infrequently enough in any single ophthalmic practice of considerable size
that clinical expertise in the condition had been difficult to accumulate
in years past. Even the accurate diagnosis of choroidal melanoma had been
sufficiently difficult to make, and an unfortunate fraction of eyes enucleated
were found to have some other condition.
The most appropriate treatment for choroidal melanoma was also uncertain.
Enucleation was the standard treatment of the time when Zimmerman and McLean
et al1-2 raised a question in
the late 1970s as to whether enucleation might cause tumor dissemination and
thereby increase the . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
The COMS Randomized Trial of Iodine 125 Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma, II: Characteristics of Patients Enrolled and Not Enrolled: COMS Report No. 17
The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):951-965.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
The COMS Randomized Trial of Iodine 125 Brachytherapy for Choroidal Melanoma, III: Initial Mortality Findings: COMS Report No. 18
The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119(7):969-982.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
18 Years' experience with high dose rate strontium-90 brachytherapy of small to medium sized posterior uveal melanoma
van Ginderdeuren et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:1306-1310.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|