You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 3, March 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Correspondence
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Reliability and Validity of a Proposed Dry Eye Evaluation Scheme

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Schiffman et al1 have recently developed a new method for the evaluation of dry eyes that they hope will be of value when used in future clinical trials. The proposed name is the Ocular Surface Disease Index.

This term, developed by the Outcomes Research Group at Allergan Inc (Irvine, Calif) to assess dry eyes, is overly broad and should be modified. Other diseases that characteristically affect much of the ocular surface, with microbial and allergic origins, would also fall under the proposed index.

In addition, the authors and others2 have designated a Schirmer test reading of 6 to 10 mm as indicative of a mild to moderate tear abnormality. The best available data suggest a Schirmer reading of 5.5 mm, without anesthesia, as the most appropriate delineation between normal and abnormal.3 If higher values are used, the validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index is questionable because of an overestimation . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.