You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 119 No. 11, November 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book and Software Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati
What's this?

Diagnosis and Management of Ocular Motility Disorders, 3rd ed

by Alec M. Ansons and Helen Davis, 532 pp, with illus, $160, ISBN 0-632-04798-4, Malden, Mass, Blackwell Science Inc, 2001.

Arch Ophthalmol. 2001;119:1734-1735.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

This book is the third edition of the original text by Joyce Mein and Brian Harcourt. The new authors maintain the basic framework of the book, and they are leaders in orthoptic training programs and have revised the book to reflect the expanding role of the orthoptist with regard to management and treatment recommendations. This is a well-written text that provides an excellent background for the evaluation of motility disorders in a format that is easy to read and comprehend.

The book is very organized, beginning with assessment and diagnosis, continuing with nonsurgical and surgical treatment, and culminating with the application of certain conservative (nonsurgical) and surgical treatments to specific conditions. The book's 23 chapters are split into 3 sections. The first section, "Assessment," provides evaluation of ocular motility disorders and includes a thorough and comprehensive review of the assessment of visual function. They presume basic knowledge of anatomy and . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.