You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 8, August 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1063.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 140 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dr. C.H. Williams, of Boston, said that it seems rational where a cut is made, to close it. In one case of his father's the suture was left in 40 days, and there was no irritation. His father used to make the Le Brun corneal section. If you have a conjuctival flap, a number of sutures, three or four, can be inserted and can secure a prompt closing of the wound. There is prompt healing of the conjuctiva, and thus the cornea is better nourished and assisted in healing. However, the use of corneal sutures is not a routine method of treatment with himself. Where there is prolapse of the iris or vitreous, or where the patient is asthmatic, it can be well used.

Reference: Bates WH. Suture of the cornea after removal of the lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:242-243.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.