You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 7, July 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:917.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 116 words of the full text and any section headings.

Some pathologists believe that sarcoidosis is a type of noncaseating tuberculosis, while others maintain that it is a separate disease entity of unknown origin. The similarity of the clinical manifestations of sarcoidosis and tuberculosis and the resemblance of the biopsy findings frequently make the differential diagnosis of these diseases difficult. In cases in which the presence of acid-fast bacilli can be demonstrated, there is no question about the diagnosis; in the absence of clinical signs of tuberculosis and in cases in which examination fails to disclose Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the biopsy findings may be considered characteristic of either tuberculosis or sarcoidosis.

Reference: Benedict WL. Sarcoidosis involving the orbit: report of two cases. Arch Ophthalmol. 1949;42:546.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.