You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 6, June 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:760.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 140 words of the full text and any section headings.

Elschnig (1931), on reviewing his results with the various intracapsular methods, came to the following conclusions: He abandoned the Smith operation because an iridectomy was always necessary and the loss of vitreous was too great. The Barraquer method was too difficult and caused too much loss of vitreous. He was pleased with the forceps operation and recommended it for general adoption. This manuever succeeded in 80 per cent of the cases; in 10 per cent the capsule ruptured, and in 10 per cent the forceps did not take hold. Of 468 cases from his clinic, loss of vitreous occurred in 25. The capsule ruptured in 23 cases. In 40 cases the pupil was drawn upward; glaucoma was observed in 5 cases, and detachment occurred in 2 cases.

Reference: Knapp A. Present state of intracapsular cataract operation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1947;38:29.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.