You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 3, March 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:411.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 148 words of the full text and any section headings.

Dr Knapp said, in former times when, afraid of the danger, he had cauterized superficially, the treatment had been negative, ie, followed by no marked improvement. During the last six or eight years he had used galvano-cautery, with a disciform electrode. Without perforation of the cornea the effect was slight, and the operation had to be repeated. Of late he therefore had perforated the cornea; the results had been good, no eye lost; in one eye the heat had produced a cataract; the eye after extraction obtained very good sight. He had usually applied the electrode a little below the centre of the cornea, had made iridectomy in two cases, in one for optical purposes, in the other for glaucoma which had set in when the corneal fistula had closed.

Reference: Knapp H. The surgical treatment of keratoconus and high degrees of myopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:452.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.