You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 2, February 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  50 Years Ago in the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past...

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:197.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 107 words of the full text and any section headings.

The graft must be in contact with good corneal stroma in as great an area as possible, otherwise satisfactory clarity will not result. The recent trend to the use of larger grafts has been attended with greater visual success. Scarring at the edges of a large graft has less chance of encroaching on the central visual area. The graft must not be large enough to interfere with the angle of the anterior chamber or to allow incarceration or prolapse of the iris at the edges. Beveling of the edges of the graft or the recipient cornea is not necessary.

Reference: McLean J. Technic. Arch Ophthalmol. 1950;43:165.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.