You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 10, October 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 2000;118:1348.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 124 words of the full text and any section headings.

The author cannot but concur with Schmidt-Rimpler that the results reported by Deutschmann, though surprising, cannot shake his opinion that the retina is detached by exudation from the choroid. Thus far Samelsohn's proposition, to treat detachment of the retina by diaphoresis, decubitus, and pressure-bandage for three or four weeks (or longer), promises the best results. All operative methods of treatment that have hitherto been tried are to be deprecated. Those implicating the retina and vitreous are most fraught with danger, whereas paracentesis of the subretinal space by a puncture of the sclerotic and choroid is least prejudicial. The prophylactic and curative treatment of the primary difficulty, the uveitis, remains of paramount importance.

Reference: Horstmann C. Spontaneous detachment of the retina. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:483.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.