This Article  • Full text  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1102.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 113 words of the full text and any section headings.

Mr. X., a married man, occupying a public position, consulted me September 29, 1897, for what was clearly gonorrhoeal ophthalmia of the left eye. He rather lamely tried to deny the possibility of such a thing, but after cover-glass preparations had been examined in his presence he acknowledged having had a discharge from the urethra, but was quite positive it was not specific in nature. His manner was so decidedly guilty that I was convinced he was fearful of domestic or other trouble should the true nature of his disease be known.

Reference: Kibb AB. A plea for the more general use of the microscope in diagnosis by ophthalmologists. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:369.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?