 |
 |

A look at the past . . .
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1086.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 80 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
Since Mauthner, in 1867 (Die Lehre vom Glaucom), suggested that "congenital hydrophthalmia is nothing but a glaucoma developed in utero, or soon after birthmore likely secondary than primary," and Muralt, a pupil of Horner, two years later in his inaugural dissertation, called special attention to this view of its pathology, it has generally been considered to be the result of a glaucomatic process due to uveal inflammation.
Reference: Report of a Case of Kerato-Globus. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:202.
|