
The CONSORT StatementWill It Lead to Improved Reporting of Clinical Trials in Ophthalmology?
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(5):677-680.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
JAMA
Beyond CONSORT: Need for Improved Reporting Standards for Clinical Trials
Curtis L. Meinert, PhD.
The increasing use of trials as vehicles for choosing among treatments has fueled drives for standardizing the way trials are reported. These drives have been propelled by editors, frustrated readers, and meta-analysts desiring the same basic information and counts.
There is no doubt that all of these groups would benefit from better reporting of trials and by analyses subsumed under the heading analysis by treatment assignment or analysis by intention to treat. To that end, there are reasons to applaud the efforts of biomedical journals to support the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement. Content suggestions and checklists are useful in preparing reports of trials. Hence, the CONSORT checklist is useful. A worthwhile addition to the list would be an item on treatment effects monitoring, since monitoring is part and parcel of . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Barbara S. Hawkins, PhD
Baltimore, Md
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care
Eldridge et al.
Clin Trials 2004;1:80-90.
ABSTRACT
Clinical Trials in the Journal of Pediatric Psychology: Applying the CONSORT Statement
Stinson et al.
J Pediatr Psychol 2003;28:159-167.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Application of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) in the Fracture Care Literature
Bhandari et al.
JBJS 2002;84:485-489.
FULL TEXT
|