You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 5, May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past. . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:622.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

KNAPP (New York) described in his Recent experiences with cataract-operations, 1050 in number, of which the last 400 included all complicated cases. The method of operation was usually a simple extraction without iridectomy, and the incision at the border of the transparent cornea, almost half its extent. The capsule was opened with the cysitome to the extent of five or six mm in the upper part underneath the iris, so that the torn pupillary edge of the iris and the wounded capsule should not touch. Pressure at the lower part of the cornea easily delivers the lens, but contact of the border of the lid and the corneal wound should be avoided. Both eyes are bandaged afterwards, and the dressing changed after twenty-four hours. . . . In 355 operations prolapse of the iris occurred fifteen times(7.6%) and was successfully treated by iridectomy. Secondary operations were done in 40% of . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.