You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 2, February 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:280.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 103 words of the full text and any section headings.

Nearly One Hundred Years of the Ophthalmoscope

No instrument in general medicine has influenced and developed a specialty as the ophthalmoscope has done for ophthalmology. On the occasion of my lectures on the physiology of the sense organs, I made a discovery which may be of real value to ophthalmology; it was so simple, requiring no more knowledge than what I had learned of optics in high school, that it is laughable that other people and I could have been so obtuse as not to have recognized it before.

Reference: Sachs M. Nearly one hundred years of the ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1948;40:268, 270.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.