You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 2, February 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:258.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

To pursue the method for which my plea is made does not necessitate a thorough training in bacteriological technique. A little practice in staining cover-glass preparations both in the usual way and by Gram's method, together with a study of the pictures presented by the gonococcus and the pneumococcus, will enable one, as a rule, to make an immediate diagnosis. When we fail to find the latter in cases at all suspicious, it may be advisable to resort to cultures, but these instances will be in the great minority. To grow the gonococcus will require the aid of a trained bacteriologist, as it is probably the most difficult of all organisms to cultivate on artificial media, but fortunately the appearance of a cover-glass preparation is so characteristic that a mistake is scarcely possible to one having any training in bacterioscopy.

Reference: Kibbe AB. A plea for the more general use . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.