You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 11, November 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Blinded by the Light—NOT!

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1547-1548.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

LASER POINTER incidents have captured national and local attention. Musicians, athletes, police officers, and school bus drivers have been dazzled. Juveniles have annoyed joggers, moviegoers, classmates, and teachers. People have been harassed in their cars and homes. Laws have been passed restricting the sale of laser pointers to minors. The public remains confused by conflicting and often misleading information in press reports on laser pointer safety.

The current issue of ARCHIVES provides important information on the macular consequences of staring into a laser pointer beam. The clinical history and foveal findings of Drs Sell and Bryan in an 11-year-old patient are convincing evidence of laser injury.1 Another reported laser pointer injury in a 34-year-old man is less persuasive2; there was no loss in visual acuity, the lesion was located away from the center of the foveola, fluorescein staining or leakage rather than a window defect would have been expected . . . [Full Text of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Maculopathy From Handheld Diode Laser Pointer
Clive H. Sell and J. Shepard Bryan
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(11):1557-1558.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Cardiac Metastasis of Choroidal Melanoma
Richard S. Ruiz, Sherif El-Harazi, Daniel M. Albert, and Paul J. Bryar
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(11):1558-1559.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Assessment of Alleged Retinal Laser Injuries
Mainster et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1210-1217.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Why HID headlights bother older drivers
Mainster and Timberlake
Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:113-117.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Laser Misuse, Legal Problems--Yes
Case
Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1307-1307.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.