This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on ISI (22)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Related article  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:1403-1406.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

ASSESSMENT OF the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in clinical practice has been an attractive but elusive goal. Despite the promise of more accurate diagnosis and better monitoring of glaucoma, standard clinical techniques for assessment have disappointed most practitioners. Perhaps RNFL evaluation with newly available instruments will be more useful and more widely implemented into clinical practice than evaluation with some of the earlier techniques. In this issue, Trible et al¹ have evaluated one of these instruments, the scanning laser polarimeter, to determine its diagnostic accuracy. By comparing the independent diagnostic judgments of 3 ophthalmologists with several algorithms that assess the polarimetric results, they conclude that the instrument can help to differentiate normal subjects from those with glaucoma, but that further study is needed before it can be used for screening. When considering these results, or the results with any other new instrument, it is reasonable for one to question . . . [Full Text of this Article]

STANDARD CLINICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE RNFL

Techniques

Limitations

Clinical Uses

NEW TECHNIQUES FOR ASSESSING THE RNFL

SCANNING LASER POLARIMETRY
Background

Clinical Studies

Potential Limitations

GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ASSESSING A NEW RNFL TECHNOLOGY

CONCLUSION


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Accuracy of Scanning Laser Polarimetry in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma
John R. Trible, Richard O. Schultz, James C. Robinson, and Terri L. Rothe
Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117(10):1298-1304.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine Classifier Analysis of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements
Bowd et al.
IOVS 2005;46:1322-1329.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of the GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimeter, HRT II Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT Optical Coherence Tomograph for the Detection of Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:827-837.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Comparison of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Using Variable Corneal Compensation and Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Photography for Detection of Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:698-704.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fourier Analysis of Optical Coherence Tomography and Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements in the Diagnosis of Glaucoma
Essock et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:1238-1245.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Fourier Analysis of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Measurements with Variable Corneal Compensation in Glaucoma
Medeiros et al.
IOVS 2003;44:2606-2612.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Measurement of the Magnitude and Axis of Corneal Polarization With Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Weinreb et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:901-906.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Is Neuroprotection a Viable Therapy for Glaucoma?
Weinreb and Levin
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1540-1544.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT