You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 1, January 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:54.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

SCHWEIGGER reports on 450 cases of retinal hemorrhage collected from the histories of 45,000 patients seen by his father in private practice. In an exhaustive and comprehensive way, everything is said which can be said on the subject. Some figures may be noticed. Pure retinal hemorrhage was found in 300 patients, ie, 6.6 to the thousand; the remainder showing inflammatory symptoms. As regards the well-known white patches, he states that in 300 eyes with hemorrhages, these patches were found 100 times. One fifth of the patients suffered from diabetes, 1/10 from albuminuria, and 1/20 from both affections at once. The number of diabetic patients with hemorrhages, but without retinitis, was three times as large as of those with both hemorrhages and retinitis. In nephritic cases, the number of patients with bilateral albuminuric retinitis was in the ratio of 8:1 as regards those with hemorrhagic retinitis. In 10 cases the well-known . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.