You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 117 No. 1, January 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  From the Archives of the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:122.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

VAN DUYSE AND VAN SCHEVENSTEEN observed, in the person of a farmer aged fifty-four, a leucosarcoma involving the greater part of the inner half of the iris, extending to the iris angle, touching the cornea, uniformly red, pervaded with vessels, and entirely free from pigment. There were no signs of inflammation, but the tension was increased. The authors discuss the clinical differentiation of this from other forms of tumor of the iris. No pigment was found in the tumor, which proved to be a spindle-celled sarcoma arising from the adventitia of the vessels. The region of Schlemm's canal, a portion of the ciliary body, and the anterior portion of the suprachoroidal space were involved; the lens was atrophic and compressed; and the detached retina had undergone cystic degeneration. Leucosarcoma of the iris is four times as rare as melanosarcoma. Both lead to metastases less frequently than sarcoma of the choroid, . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.