You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 4, April 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal

Evaluating New Retinal Imaging Techniques

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:521-522.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

OPHTHALMOLOGISTS ARE bombarded with a seemingly bewildering array of new retinal imaging techniques in the 1990s. Novel methods include, to name a few, indocyanine green (ICG) angiography with either digital video cameras1 or scanning laser ophthalmoscopes2; optical coherence tomography3; retinal thickness analyzers4; simultaneous stereophotography5; infrared imaging6; and macular pigment evaluations.7 The article by Freeman et al8 in this issue of the ARCHIVES on simultaneous fluorescein and ICG angiography provides the background for an editorial on this new imaging technique and for considering guidelines for evaluating retinal imaging methods in general. These guidelines may assist investigators who want to evaluate new techniques. They may also assist ophthalmologists in determining if a new technique offers clinically relevant advantages over existing technology and, as such, if it should be considered for incorporation into clinical practice.

OBTAIN INFORMED CONSENT

New technology, especially invasive technology, that may or may not affect patient management . . . [Full Text of this Article]


DESIGN PROSPECTIVE STUDIES

PURSUE TECHNOLOGIES WITH POTENTIAL ADVANTAGES THAT ARE CLINICALLY RELEVANT

EVALUATE POTENTIAL DISADVANTAGES OF NEW IMAGING METHODS

COMPARE NEW IMAGING TECHNOLOGY WITH EXISTING TECHNOLOGY

CONSIDER COSTS TO THE PATIENT

RELATED ARTICLE

Simultaneous Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein Angiography Using a Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope
William R. Freeman, Dirk-Uwe Bartsch, Arthur J. Mueller, Alay S. Banker, and Robert N. Weinreb
Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(4):455-463.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

20 MHz high frequency ultrasound assessment of scleral and intraocular conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma
Char et al.
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002;86:632-635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Innovation and Clinical Trials
Freeman et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:846-846.
FULL TEXT  

Evaluating New Retinal Imaging Techniques
Fritsche et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:846-847.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.