You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 116 No. 12, December 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  100 Years Ago in the Archives
 This Article
 •Full text
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

A look at the past . . .

Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1658.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 117 words of the full text and any section headings.

The writer discussed the alleged prejudicial action of the accommodation in primary glaucoma, and Snellen's theory concerning the same, which did not seem to be in unison with facts discovered by Hess regarding the act of accommodation. In the author's opinion we ought on the contrary to expect a favorable action of accommodation upon the glaucomatous process. He emphasized the contradiction between avoiding every act of accommodation as an important agent in the prophylaxis of glaucoma, and yet regarding the production of forcible and prolonged spasm of the ciliary muscle by instillations of eserine as the most active remedy for incipient glaucoma.

Reference: Glaucoma and the action of the accommodation in primary glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1898;27:341-342.







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.