You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 99 No. 9, September 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Results of Penetrating Keratoplasty Using a Double Running Suture Technique

James A. Davison, MD; William M. Bourne, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99(9):1591-1595.


Abstract

• The results of 84 consecutive penetrating keratoplasties in which a double running suture technique was used are presented herein. The second suture was smaller, looser, and more superficial than the first, causing less corneal distortion, thus allowing better visual acuity. The two sutures were removed at two and 12 months after transplantation. The visual acuities attained were almost as good at three months as at 13 months, and the graft curvature did not change notably from three to 12 months after keratoplasty. There were only two instances of postoperative wound dehiscence (2.4%). Thus, the double running suture technique allowed early visual rehabilitation without increasing the risk of corneal dehiscence from early suture removal.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Nov 14, 1980.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901 (Dr Bourne).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Half top hat wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty: 1-year results
Kaiserman et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1629-1633.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty
Bahar et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:73-78.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Half-top-hat a new wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty
Kaiserman et al.
Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:143-146.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Penetrating Keratoplasty Performed by Residents
Kutzscher et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1333-1336.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

A New Lamellar Wound Configuration for Penetrating Keratoplasty Surgery
Busin
Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:260-265.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Results of Penetrating Keratoplasty by Residents
Wiggins et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:851-853.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Removing Running Sutures on Astigmatism After Penetrating Keratoplasty
Musch et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:488-492.
ABSTRACT  

A Suction Trephine Block for Marking Donor Corneal Buttons
Pflugfelder et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:276-281.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.