You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 2, February 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Anomalous retinal correspondence. Monocular and binocular visual evoked responses

E. C. Campos

Monocular and binocular flashed visual evoked responses (VERs) were recorded in two normal subjects, two patients with partially accommodative refractive small-angle esotropia, and two patients with residual small-angle esotropia. Without optical correction the binocular VER of the patients with partially accommodative esotropia was equal to the monocular one, thus confirming suppression of the deviated eye as found with the striated glasses test. In the two patients with residual small-angle deviation and in the two with partially accomodative strabismus wearing an optical correction to reduce the angle of deviation, the binocular VER was larger than the monocular one. These patients showed anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC). Although the binocular recording of strabismic patients was smaller than the one obtained in normal subjects, still a cortical binocular interaction was found. In the subjects tested, ARC is objectively demonstrated to sustain an anomalous type of binocular vision.





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.