You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 10, October 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (60)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Specular Microscopy in Cataract and Intraocular Lens Patients

A Report of 564 Cases

Manus C. Kraff, MD; Donald R. Sanders, MD; Howard L. Lieberman, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1980;98(10):1782-1784.


Abstract

• We studied 564 patients who underwent cataract surgery, using preoperative and postoperative endothelial cell photographs and corneal thickness measurements. No statistically significant difference was noted in endothelial cell loss between patients with intracapsular cataract extraction (12.6%) and those undergoing posterior chamber phacoemulsification (15.2%). Both procedures had significantly less cell loss than with anterior chamber phacoemulsification (27.3%). Intraocular lens implantation produced a mean endothelial cell loss of 15.8% to 20.9%, depending on surgical technique and implant type. A Choycestyle lens resulted in statistically less cell loss than with other implants. Mean endothelial cell loss was 17.8% with clinically atraumatic and 27.3% with clinically traumatic implantations. Corneal thickness measurements did not correlate with endothelial cell loss or trauma observed clinically at the time of surgery and did not seem helpful in the preoperative evaluation of cataract cases.



Author Affiliations

From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois Hospital Eye and Ear Infirmary, Chicago.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Feb 6, 1980.

Reprint requests to 5600 W Addison St, Chicago, IL 60634 (Dr Kraff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Surgical Placement of an Optical Prosthetic Device for End-Stage Macular Degeneration: The Implantable Miniature Telescope
Colby et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1118-1121.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Variation in Ophthalmic Testing Before Cataract Surgery: Results of a National Survey of Ophthalmologists
Steinberg et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1994;112:896-902.
ABSTRACT  

Toxic Endothelial Cell Destruction of the Cornea After Routine Extracapsular Cataract Surgery
Breebaart et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:1121-1125.
ABSTRACT  

The Effect of Anterior Chamber Depth on Endothelial Cell Count After Filtration Surgery
Fiore et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1609-1611.
ABSTRACT  

Protective Effects of Viscous Solutions in Phacoemulsification and Traumatic Lens Implantation
Glasser et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1047-1051.
ABSTRACT  

Positive Correlation of Corneal Thickness and Endothelial Cell Loss: Serial Measurements After Cataract Surgery
Cheng et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:920-922.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss After Cataract Surgery: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Oxford Cataract Treatment and Evaluation Team (OCT
Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1170-1175.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.