You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 98 No. 1, January 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLE
 This Article
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Topically applied pilocarpine. Human pupillary response as a function of drop size

R. R. File and T. F. Patton

Previous studies with use of animal models have shown that, for topically applied ophthalmic drugs, the fraction of dose absorbed into the eye is increased as the volume in which the drug is instilled is decreased. Such findings have not previously been confirmed in humans. In the present study, the miotic response to instilled doses of 20 and 50 microL of 0.5% pilocarpine hydrochloride was compared in ten adult human volunteers. Although the 20-microL drop represents a substantial dosage reduction, the miotic response was essentially equivalent to that obtained with the 50-microL drop. These findings imply that, due to the large drainage loss of topically applied ophthalmic drugs, volumes delivered by commerical ophthalmic droppers may in some cases be larger than required to achieve the desired response.

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Topical H-7 on Outflow Facility, Intraocular Pressure, and Corneal Thickness in Monkeys
Tian et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1171-1177.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.