You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 97 No. 2, February 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CLINICAL SCIENCES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Timolol and Epinephrine

Comparison of Efficacy and Side Effects

John R. Sonntag, MD; Glen O. Brindley, MD; M. Bruce Shields, MD; Nour-Iddin T. Arafat, MD; Charles D. Phelps, MD

Arch Ophthalmol. 1979;97(2):273-277.


Abstract

• Solutions of 0.1%, 0.25%, and 0.5% timolol maleate were compared with 0.5%, 1.0%, and 2.0% epinephrine hydrochloride in a 17-week, randomized, double-masked study involving 80 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma. Intraocular pressure was lowered to 21 mm Hg or less in 28 of 42 patients treated with timolol but in only 14 of 38 patients treated with epinephrine. Mean intraocular pressure reduction was significantly greater with timolol than with epinephrine. The pressure reduction caused by either drug was maintained during the four months of the study. Tonographic data suggest that timolol lowers intraocular pressure by reducing aqueous formation. Intolerable side effects developed in two patients receiving epinephrine. Timolol was well tolerated by all patients.



Author Affiliations

From the Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC (Drs Sonntag, Brindley, and Shields), and the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City (Drs Arafat and Phelps).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication May 22, 1978.

Reprint requests to Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, IA 53342 (Dr Phelps).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Patient Selection in the Timpilo Study-Reply
Puustjarvi and Repo
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1313-1313.
ABSTRACT  

Randomized Clinical Trials on Medical Treatment of Glaucoma: Are They Appropriate to Guide Clinical Practice?
Rossetti et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:96-103.
ABSTRACT  

Apraclonidine: A One-Week Dose-Response Study
Jampel et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:1069-1073.
ABSTRACT  

Betaxolol: A New {beta}-Adrenergic Blocking Agent for Treatment of Glaucoma
Berrospi and Leibowitz
Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:943-946.
ABSTRACT  

Timolol and Epinephrine in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma: Transient Additive Effect
Thomas and Epstein
Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:91-95.
ABSTRACT  

Long-term Drift and Continued Efficacy After Multiyear Timolol Therapy
Steinert et al.
Arch Ophthalmol 1981;99:100-103.
ABSTRACT  

Exacerbation of Obstructive Airway Disease by Timolol
Jones and Ekberg
JAMA 1980;244:2730-2730.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.